Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
  1. Home
  2. Research Domains
  3. Biomedical And Clinical Sciences
  4. Medical Physiology
  5. Systems Physiology
  6. Effect Of Volume Control Ventilation Versus Pressure Control Ventilation With Volume-guaranteed Mode On Intraoperative Respiratory Mechanics And Postoperative Pulmonary Functions In Patients Undergoing Scoliosis Surgery: A Randomised Control Trial

Effect of volume control ventilation versus pressure control ventilation with volume-guaranteed mode on intraoperative respiratory mechanics and postoperative pulmonary functions in patients undergoing scoliosis surgery: A randomised control trial

Kadali Vejendla1, Srilata Moningi2, Shibani Padhy2

  • 1Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Nizam's Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India.

Journal of Perioperative Practice|June 14, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

View abstract on PubMed

Summary

Pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed improves lung mechanics and gas exchange during prone spinal fusion surgery for scoliosis. This ventilation mode offers advantages over volume-guaranteed ventilation, reducing airway pressure and dead space ventilation.

Area of Science:

  • Anesthesiology
  • Respiratory Physiology
  • Spinal Surgery

Background:

  • Posterior spinal fusion for thoracolumbar scoliosis in the prone position poses significant pulmonary complication risks.
  • Pressure-controlled ventilation volume-guaranteed (PCVV) aims to optimize ventilation by regulating inspiratory pressure to achieve target tidal volumes at minimal airway pressure.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of PCVV against standard volume-guaranteed ventilation (VV) in patients undergoing prone spinal fusion for scoliosis.
  • To evaluate the impact of PCVV on pulmonary mechanics, gas exchange, and atelectasis incidence.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 51 patients with thoracolumbar scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal fusion.
  • Patients were allocated to either VV (n=24) or PCVV (n=27) groups.
  • Primary endpoints included peak airway pressure (Ppeak), dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn), and arterial blood gas analysis; atelectasis was assessed via lung ultrasonography.

Main Results:

  • PCVV significantly reduced Ppeak and improved Cdyn compared to VV.
  • PCVV led to lower PaCO2 and reduced the arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide gradient, indicating improved dead space ventilation.
  • Oxygenation, hemodynamic stability, and overall atelectasis scores were similar between the groups.

Conclusions:

  • PCVV offers significant benefits in managing pulmonary function during prone spinal fusion surgery for scoliosis.
  • The mode enhances airway mechanics and reduces dead space ventilation, potentially mitigating pulmonary complications.
Keywords:
Anaesthetics – management and careClinical education and trainingEnhanced recovery programmesPatient safetyResearch – quantitativeTrauma and orthopaedic surgeryoutcomes

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies