Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
  1. Home
  2. Research Domains
  3. Engineering
  4. Mechanical Engineering
  5. Dynamics, Vibration And Vibration Control
  6. Midtarsal Joint Stiffness Alters The Metabolic Cost Of Simulated Running Via Mechanisms Other Than Changes In Foot Energy Storage And Return

Midtarsal joint stiffness alters the metabolic cost of simulated running via mechanisms other than changes in foot energy storage and return

Daniel J Davis1, John H Challis2

  • 1Department of Health & Kinesiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering|June 14, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

View abstract on PubMed

Summary

Stiffer foot arches reduce running costs for rearfoot strikers but increase them for non-rearfoot strikers. This suggests arch stiffness impacts running efficiency through mechanisms other than simple energy storage and return.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Human locomotion
  • Sports science

Background:

  • The foot's arch is hypothesized to enhance running metabolic efficiency.
  • Understanding the role of foot arch mechanics in running economy is crucial for sports performance and injury prevention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of midtarsal joint (foot arch) stiffness on the metabolic cost of transport during rearfoot and non-rearfoot strike running.
  • To explore the underlying mechanical mechanisms responsible for changes in metabolic cost with varying foot arch stiffness.

Main Methods:

  • Computational musculoskeletal simulations were employed to model steady-state running.
  • Simulations analyzed rearfoot and non-rearfoot strike gaits across a spectrum of midtarsal joint stiffnesses.
  • Metabolic cost of transport and mechanical work at the midtarsal joint were quantified.

Main Results:

  • Increasing midtarsal joint stiffness decreased metabolic cost of transport by approximately 5% in rearfoot strike running.
  • Conversely, increasing stiffness increased metabolic cost of transport by approximately 11% in non-rearfoot strike running.
  • Mechanical work at the midtarsal joint decreased with increasing stiffness in both running conditions, irrespective of the observed metabolic cost changes.

Conclusions:

  • Foot arch stiffness has a differential impact on running economy depending on the foot strike pattern.
  • The findings suggest that mechanisms beyond passive elastic energy storage and return, such as altered joint work or muscle activation patterns, influence metabolic cost.
  • Optimizing foot arch mechanics may be specific to individual running styles for improved metabolic efficiency.
Keywords:
Foot arch stiffnesscomputational gait simulationmetabolic cost of runningmusculoskeletal modelingrunning foot strike type

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies