Software quality, processes and metrics research encompass the study of methods and standards used to measure, control, and improve software development outcomes. This field addresses the evaluation of software quality through metrics that guide development processes, testing, and assurance activities. Critical within software engineering, it ensures software systems meet performance, reliability, and user satisfaction goals. JoVE Visualize enhances understanding by pairing PubMed articles from this domain with detailed experiment videos, helping researchers and students grasp complex methodologies and findings more effectively.
Traditional approaches to software quality focus on established metrics such as defect density, code coverage, and mean time to failure. These metrics provide quantitative insights into software reliability and maintainability. Software quality processes often include systematic quality assurance practices like code reviews, automated testing, and process audits. Examples of software quality processes and metrics in software testing include tracking test case effectiveness and using QA metrics dashboards to monitor project health. Researchers also rely on software process metrics to evaluate productivity and adherence to development standards, contributing to continuous improvement within Agile and other development frameworks.
Recent advances explore integrating real-time analytics and machine learning to predict software defects and optimize quality assurance efforts. Adaptive QA metrics in Agile environments emphasize flexibility in measuring and responding to quality challenges during iterative development. Innovations also involve enhanced visualization tools for QA metric dashboards and deeper analysis of the 3 C's of software quality—correctness, completeness, and consistency. Emerging research investigates how automated pipelines can effectively incorporate software quality metrics pdf-based guidelines to streamline compliance and reporting, offering new perspectives on quality control and process optimization.
Guilherme Nilson Alves Dos Santos, Alice Corrêa Silva-Sousa, Angelo José Sócrates Torres-Carrillo, Guilherme de Araujo Braz, Thais Oliveira Alves, Fabiane Carneiro Lopes-Olhê, Yara Teresinha Corrêa Silva-Sousa, Jardel Francisco Mazzi-Chaves, Ricardo Gariba Silva, Manoel Damião Sousa-Neto
Ibraheem A Qurban, Timothy K Gates, Eric D Morway, John T Cox, Jeremy T White, Ryan T Bailey, Michael N Fienen
Rui Deng, Tianci Zhu, Weilin Zhou, Fang Liu, Xiaosong Lin
Dheyaa Hussein Sadah Al Azzawi, Amir Jalali, Marziyeh Rezaei
Chiara Di Resta, Francesco Paleari, Assunta Naclerio, Floriana Iannace, Roberto Leone, Ivan Shashkin, Marco Fumagalli, Chiara Sacco, Lucia Bellocchi, Massimo Locatelli, Giuseppe Banfi, Paola M V Rancoita, Rossella Tomaiuolo
Jiabin Wang, Yayun Xiang, Xiaodong Li, Jialun Shen, Zongquan Sun, Zhaoyue Liu, Lan Yang, Huan Yang, Hejing Wang, Hong Chang, Fujun Ma
Xiaodan Liu, Shengcheng Cui, Zhi Qiao, Huiqiang Xu, Xuebin Li, Tao Luo
Liliana Centanaro Acuña, Juan Roberto de Jesus Rua Díaz, Ricardo Alfonso Roman Herazo, Alcindo Neckel, Caliane Christie Oliveira de Almeida Silva, Grace Tibério Cardoso, Guilherme Peterle Schmitz, Andrea Liliana Moreno-Ríos, Claudete Gindri Ramos